Think about everyone you know or have ever known. Think about your parents, your siblings, your significant others, your friends and your co-workers. Heck even think about your pets.
Now ask yourself, can any of these creatures read your mind? And, can you read theirs?
The answer is unequivocally, no.
Why? Because no one can. It's scientifically impossible to have the thoughts of one person's brain inside the brain of another person.
Still, this does not hamper the belief among many people that it's true. Putting aside surveys that support this, the evidence is in our vernacular.
"I know what you're thinking..."
"He thinks I'm an idiot. I could tell by the way he was looking at me."
"My cat thinks I'm funny."
"If you could read my mind love, what a tale my thoughts would tell."
Some of this vernacular is even specific to the workplace:
"I don't need to meet with my employees. They know what I think of their performance."
"I want that person fired. They have an attitude problem."
"I think my boss hates me."
All of which make me cringe.
I cringe because I know these are all mind reads with no basis in fact. A more common word for them is assumptions. And in each case assumptions that have a greater chance of causing more harm than good.
One of the most important things that I learned in my early HR career was the difference between attitude and behavior. And the only thing that you KNOW to be true of an employee is from their behavior. No one has any idea what another person is thinking or what their attitude is. The most productive employee in the history of your organization could hate you. Could you tell from their productivity? Probably not. Does it matter? Absolutely not. They're getting paid to behave in a certain manner that accomplishes a work goal. Beyond that, are you expecting to control their thoughts too?
I think about this frequently due to our society's willingness to be more transparent through social media outlets. In turn, there's a greater desire by employers to take a peak to see what their employees are really like. The first mistake is that it provides employers with information about employees that has nothing to do with the employee's role at work. The second is it leads to bigger assumptions, particularly through photographs: the cigarette in their hand, is it pot? The cocktail glass, is it filled with vodka or water? The person in the hospital bed is sick, is it something communicable? Frank Roche's KnowHR Blog put it bluntly "Facebook Is None Of HR's Business." And it is simply not.
What it is is simply communication. If you don't communicate verbally or in writing, employees have no idea how well they are performing. No one has an attitude problem, only behavioral; and if you can't communicate that before wanting to fire someone, then the behavior problem is you. And lastly your boss probably does hate you. But what is your boss doing that makes you think that? If you can't communicate evidence than it's just an assumption. They're all assumptions. And they do nothing toward furthering the organization's goals or bettering someone's acumen.
A wise man a long time ago on a classic sitcom said, "when you assume, you make an ASS out of yoU and ME." Great advice that has stuck with me through my career. The wise man was Tony Randall and the show was "The Odd Couple." The below clip is a little long. But be patient and don't make any assumptions until it's finished. I think it's comic genius. Maybe you will too.
Can You Read Minds?
Posted by
Paul Smith
on Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Labels:
Communications,
Human Resources,
Odd Couple,
Social Media




6 Comments:
A Gordon Lightfoot reference? This is one for the ages. I'm going to hear that song all day.
Paul, it's such a good point about not being able to read a person's mind. And it's so tempting to think that we can.
Thanks for the thoughtful post...and for GL...and for that laugh from The Off Couple. I love what you do...thought provoking and entertaining. That's gold, amigo.
is that gordon lightfoot. jim croce came to my mind, without a google check. whatever. yeah, i'll be humming that too. maybe i'll throw in "time in a bottle" to make me really ill.
lol -- and lastly your boss probably does hate you.
f
if there is one place false assumptions run rampant, it's the workplace. i hate it. it gets us all into trouble. and HR unfortunately falls into this trap all too often. we're guilty of taking other people's "word for it." unfortunately, that word is often based on assumptions. we need to be the end-all-to-be-all for fact checking and wake-up-calls. thanks for the poignant post.
such a great post! The flipside of this discussion? Employees think they can read their management/leadership/HR/supervisor's mind. And then they change their behaviors based upon what they assume from said 'mind reading'. So, while transparency into our employees' lives should be off-limits to the extent it doesn't impact their on-the-job performance, transparency should be something we, as organizational leaders, strive for. And not just with our external customers, but with our employees as well. Maybe it will get them out of our heads.
@Frank: Thanks for the kind words. I'm blushing like the KnowHR-fanboy that I am.
@Fran: Hmmm. I just recently bought Jim Croce's GH (which will please my parents)--never liked G. Lightfoot, in fact I can't stand that song.
@Charlie: I'm glad you picked up on what I was so eloquently not saying > that it's HR responsible to quell the mind reading.
@Nancy: You're right it does go both ways and that the transparency should be transferred into the workplace. As leaders, we just can't be lurkers.
paul, jim croce = my dad. great memories for me. i'll come over and we'll listen and sing. it'll be as embarrassing as me singing foghat at percy street bbq tonight.
f
Post a Comment